| Source.Code.2011.DVDRip.Xvid.Maxspeed (Source Code *2011*) |
|
 |
| Sample Screenshots |
 |  |  |  |  |
Compare Release
Quality Ratings
|
Rating: 6.5/10
(17 votes cast)
|
Rating: 6.5/10
(17 votes cast)
|
Rating: 7.1/10
(16 votes cast)
|
Comments & Reviews
Posted on: 2011-07-11 15:57:30 +5 -1
Are you kidding? Maxspeed, really....
I thought this site was picky about release groups they promoted. It's not even a DVDRip, the source is the HDTVRip that's floating around. Maxspeed has gotta be the weakest release group in existance, constantly mislabeling. You are doing this site a disservice by posting up this kind of garbage.
I thought this site was picky about release groups they promoted. It's not even a DVDRip, the source is the HDTVRip that's floating around. Maxspeed has gotta be the weakest release group in existance, constantly mislabeling. You are doing this site a disservice by posting up this kind of garbage.
^Did this really deserve 1's across the board? I agree that the source is bullshit (they even admit as much in the nfo) but if you rate based on what they "claim" it to be it still deserves a semi-decent rating. Please be fair with your ratings, no matter how much you hate the group ;)
From nfo: "Source: HDTV DVD (no hardcoded foreign subtitle and also no crop as all other available encodes,perfect a/v/sync quality,sample included"
So what we have here is probably the "cleanest" release of Source Code so far. No Korean subs, no savage cropping. Audio is fine... So whether you like Maxspeed or not, the release is perfectly watch-able.
(FYI: This was submitted to the site by a user. Therefore, it's clearly "in the wild" and once verified we listed it... We only filter out stuff we can't verify, stuff that doesn't come with an nfo and stuff that doesn't follow normal naming conventions. It's also why we introduced the "turd" icon for releases that are total stinkers :) )
From nfo: "Source: HDTV DVD (no hardcoded foreign subtitle and also no crop as all other available encodes,perfect a/v/sync quality,sample included"
So what we have here is probably the "cleanest" release of Source Code so far. No Korean subs, no savage cropping. Audio is fine... So whether you like Maxspeed or not, the release is perfectly watch-able.
(FYI: This was submitted to the site by a user. Therefore, it's clearly "in the wild" and once verified we listed it... We only filter out stuff we can't verify, stuff that doesn't come with an nfo and stuff that doesn't follow normal naming conventions. It's also why we introduced the "turd" icon for releases that are total stinkers :) )
Ya fair enough, I probably shouldn't have gone 1 across the board, the content of the movie is atleast a 3. LuLz.
But for sure the rest deserves nothing more than 1, for the simple fact that they missrepresent their releases. Not everyone has unlimited bandwidth to waste downloading mislabeled torrents.
Bottom line is Maxspeed does this crap on a regular basis, plus they never give credit to a source. Instead they make outlandish claims like with this release ("HDTV DVD" gimme a break that isn't even anything real) instead of simply saying "Source: MOMENTUM". It's bloody ridiculous, they are the bottom of the barrel, and I am sick of people sticking up for them and their nonsense.
You mentioned that once you've verified a release it gets listed, but you also say releases that don't follow normal naiming conventions don't get to stay up. So how in the hell does this follow normal naming when it is clearly MISLABELED as a DVDRip?
If you feel this is an appropriate representation of the content you want on your site, that is fine, you run it anyway you like. I just think it is sad that any release site would include such trash (and most don't). The least you could do is include a turd icon for Maxspeed.
::EDIT:: Sorry, I should have been clearer... I meant naming convention as in "RELEASE.NAME.SOURCE.FORMAT-GROUP" not mislabelling. I agree that Maxspeed and many other P2P groups mislabel though but that's why we say "Rate it based on what the claimed source is" because if it's a shitty TS they dress-up as a DVD rip it'll then be reflected in the ratings. P.S. Sorry for the comments thread takeover folks :) - Neversoft::
But for sure the rest deserves nothing more than 1, for the simple fact that they missrepresent their releases. Not everyone has unlimited bandwidth to waste downloading mislabeled torrents.
Bottom line is Maxspeed does this crap on a regular basis, plus they never give credit to a source. Instead they make outlandish claims like with this release ("HDTV DVD" gimme a break that isn't even anything real) instead of simply saying "Source: MOMENTUM". It's bloody ridiculous, they are the bottom of the barrel, and I am sick of people sticking up for them and their nonsense.
You mentioned that once you've verified a release it gets listed, but you also say releases that don't follow normal naiming conventions don't get to stay up. So how in the hell does this follow normal naming when it is clearly MISLABELED as a DVDRip?
If you feel this is an appropriate representation of the content you want on your site, that is fine, you run it anyway you like. I just think it is sad that any release site would include such trash (and most don't). The least you could do is include a turd icon for Maxspeed.
::EDIT:: Sorry, I should have been clearer... I meant naming convention as in "RELEASE.NAME.SOURCE.FORMAT-GROUP" not mislabelling. I agree that Maxspeed and many other P2P groups mislabel though but that's why we say "Rate it based on what the claimed source is" because if it's a shitty TS they dress-up as a DVD rip it'll then be reflected in the ratings. P.S. Sorry for the comments thread takeover folks :) - Neversoft::
I thought this release was perfectly watchable regardless of the mislabeling. In regards to the naming convention of releases, that includes only how the title is named. It does not guarantee proper labeling....only naming. ;)
